Hong Et Al. Reply to Walliser

نویسندگان

  • Daniel C. Hong
  • Paul V. Quinn
چکیده

We find it absurd that Walliser [1] essentially used the same analysis and obtained identical results as reported in [3], yet arrived at different conclusions. Namely, based on an incomplete theory and using erroneous arguments , he not only disputes the original results [2], but also claims them wrong. A more complete theory and much more detailed studies were published in [3], from which we concluded that such results support the mechanism of segregation introduced in ref. [2]. We want to make it clear that Walliser obtained partial results of ref. [3] and arrived at the opposite conclusion. In the following we discuss his comment and its relevance, but at the same time point out what went wrong with his arguments. First, the free energy functional used in refs. [1,3] is the granular gas/fluid free energy. The observation of either the Brazil-Nut or the reverse Brazil-Nut [2] was, however, discussed and connected to the condensation or crys-tallization of the material at the bottom of the container. In such very dense situations in the absence of convection, the geometrical size-segregation presumably overrides other segregation phenomena [4]. If the system density is nowhere close to the crystallization density, the fluid free energy description is appropriate for the granular gas. The other situations, where parts of the system are condensed/crystallized, cannot be explained qualitatively by a gas/fluid free energy-as attempted in the Comment [1] and cannot be understood by a gas/fluid based approach. The correct way of describing such crystallization is to go beyond a simple density functional approach [1,3], and use the weighted density functional approach, see ref. [5] and references therein. Also other attempts based on Enskog theory [6], and/or empirical predictions for a global equation of state [7] and numerical modeling, at least account for the crystallization and the corresponding change of material behavior. Such advanced methods clearly reveal the formation of crystals 1

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”

Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.

متن کامل

Environmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)

Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...

متن کامل

Letter to editor

Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...

متن کامل

Hospitalised care for patients with transient ischaemic attack.

Authors’ reply: Transient ischaemic attack patients are often underevaluated To the Editor—I read with interest the article by Ng et al in the April 2004 issue of the Hong Kong Medical Journal. Its objective was to issue guidelines for the care of acute stroke patients in Hong Kong. The authors recommended that patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) should be referred for fast-track ass...

متن کامل

On Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al

Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002